Dear USA Occupants: Both Legal and Illegal:
I just love my fellow occupants of this great country--every single one of you! Ahhh... let me rethink that... Do I really love murders, adulterers, wife beaters, child molesters, and stupid people? Yes, I am committed to unconditional love. Agape. To unconditional love without the thought of benefit or of power. Why, I don't know, though.
So, I have toyed with what to call us all, though. Citizens and illegal aliens? Legals and Illegals? Occupants. I really love that one. We all occupy this land--we don't really own it and we won't be here forever. We are occupying it for now but will each of us be leaving it behind some day soon. The People? That's a good name. People who live here? I like that, too. We the People. The Tribe? Our Tribe? The Tribe of The People Who Occupy the United States--that's quite a name. Of course, we could just stick with "Americans."
As I go on about my business of being Someone Who Shares What She Thinks at every opportunity for the betterment and enlightenment of our society of The People, I get very frustrated and find it very difficult to love certain people--I know, even I have trouble love everyone all the time.
You might think I have a hard time loving Republicans and Far Right Wing Conservatives Who Cannot Think for Themselves. Au contraire. They are so pathetic and easy to love. OH, damn, I have insulted them again! Bless their hearts!
No, the folks I have a hard time loving are my fellow Occupants, My People, My Tribe Members Who Occupy the United States of America.. I cannot bear to say the words... I am getting agitated... who... tears are forming... who... who are disengaged! I said it!
I have a hard time loving Americans Who don't vote! Who don't read newspapers! Who don't vote! Who don't belong to their political parties! Who don't vote! Who don't know where they vote or what assembly, senate, or congressional districts they live in. AND, WHO WILL NOT COME OUT TO THE COUNTLESS FREE EVENTS SPONSORED BY ORGANIZATIONS AND CANDIDATES THAT WOULD GIVE THEM A BIGGER WELCOME THAN A COUNTRY CHURCH!
People all over the world would love to come to the USA, join a political party, attend meetings freely, run for a little local office, make decisions about events & speakers, write letters, speak up at meetings, march around the capital, and VOTE! People still die for the right to vote. People are imprisoned for writing letters to the editors of the newspapers. People are in prisons for using email and Facebook!
So, I was thinking of exporting everyone who doesn't care enough to participate in Democracy and giving instant citizenship to people who have risked their lives to come here illegally! Yep, if you don't vote in 2 elections, you get deported. If you rode on top of a train, swam a dangerous river, walked through a desert, or hid in a container box to get to the USA, you get to stay! If you were a political prisoner, you come here for free and someone who doesn't vote gets deported.
And, I am changing the vocabulary. I am not saying "political" or "politics" any more. I am saying using the term, "citizenship." Yes, I am participating in citizenship when I go to rallies or volunteer for the Dems or volunteer for candidates--not politics.
And, if you are not participating in citizenship and our lives get worse--I blame YOU! If it gets better--go ahead, thank me and all the other people you know who are active in CITIZENSHIP ACTIVITIES! I deserve it! I am working on citizenship like a dog.
Oh, I do so love my fellow occupants so much. Frankly, I haven't gotten far on my journey toward agape: I will love you far more AFTER you have engaged in 10 citizenship activities. But, I do love you a little bit!
Your friend,
Vivian

Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Dear Puritans
Dear Puritans & Separatists:
I simply adore you in spite of the horrible accusations that have been made against you: small pox blankets, measles, influenza, plague... Wiping out 90% of of the native population of a continent. Trying to remember why I love you. Hmmm... Oh! Thanksgiving Day. There was a feast and I do love a good feast! And, you were plucky--gotta give you that. But, I digress.
Well, there is just so much talk of separation of church & state lately, you have been on my mind. You get so much credit for coming to North America for the principle of "Religious Freedom." I do love Religious Freedom. For everyone, of course! Not just for myself. I am not selfish with freedom.
Because, I just hate practicing other people's religion--it really gets on my nerves! I have a perfectly good theology of my own--why should I have to practice someone else's? In fact: "Practice religion, don't legislate it" is a motto of mine. I carry a sign reading that at Planned Parenthood & Naral rallies. I digress, again!
Puritans, I don't want to hurt your feelings, but I am questioning your position on Religious Freedom, human rights, voter rights, capital punishment... and a bunch of stuff. Oh... I do so hope I haven't hurt your feelings!
But, if I have understood history correctly, you did not sail to North America for the "principle" of religious freedom BUT for freedom for yourselves. Because, didn't you immediately set up a little theocracy? Didn't you persecute a few people who just happened not to be in agreement with you -- not to mention alleged witches? Quakers and Baptists didn't fare too well, did they. OMG! Our founding mothers and fathers were THEOCRATS?
Oh... wait... now I am really confusing myself, Dear Puritans and Separatists, weren't you organized as a stock company? A trading company? Don't know much about history, but... OMG! Our founding mother and fathers were CORPORATISTS? And... THEOCRATS?
And, didn't you persecute other religions by denying them the right to vote? OMG! Our very founding mothers and fathers were engaged in VOTER SUPPRESSION in the Plymouth and the Massachusetts Bay Colonies?
Of course, I am proud that you only hanged people in the town square and didn't burn anyone at the stake. But, still, your record on CAPITAL PUNISHMENT stinks.
Thank goodness there were a few others who came along. Almost had an anxiety attack until I remembered Thomas Jefferson. Whew.
Our great country still has its share of citizens who want the USA to be a Christian theocracy. We have many citizens support the rights of corporations as people. We actually have political leaders who rig elections and write laws to suppress voting. We have many citizens who strongly support murder by the state: capital punishment. The ideological descendants of Puritans? I will leave that to historians and philosophers but I suspect that is paying them too high a compliment. The Puritans valued education.
Oh, and I just love them all!
Oh, I hope I didn't hurt anyone's feelings!
Your friend,
Vivian
I simply adore you in spite of the horrible accusations that have been made against you: small pox blankets, measles, influenza, plague... Wiping out 90% of of the native population of a continent. Trying to remember why I love you. Hmmm... Oh! Thanksgiving Day. There was a feast and I do love a good feast! And, you were plucky--gotta give you that. But, I digress.
Well, there is just so much talk of separation of church & state lately, you have been on my mind. You get so much credit for coming to North America for the principle of "Religious Freedom." I do love Religious Freedom. For everyone, of course! Not just for myself. I am not selfish with freedom.
Because, I just hate practicing other people's religion--it really gets on my nerves! I have a perfectly good theology of my own--why should I have to practice someone else's? In fact: "Practice religion, don't legislate it" is a motto of mine. I carry a sign reading that at Planned Parenthood & Naral rallies. I digress, again!
Puritans, I don't want to hurt your feelings, but I am questioning your position on Religious Freedom, human rights, voter rights, capital punishment... and a bunch of stuff. Oh... I do so hope I haven't hurt your feelings!
But, if I have understood history correctly, you did not sail to North America for the "principle" of religious freedom BUT for freedom for yourselves. Because, didn't you immediately set up a little theocracy? Didn't you persecute a few people who just happened not to be in agreement with you -- not to mention alleged witches? Quakers and Baptists didn't fare too well, did they. OMG! Our founding mothers and fathers were THEOCRATS?
Oh... wait... now I am really confusing myself, Dear Puritans and Separatists, weren't you organized as a stock company? A trading company? Don't know much about history, but... OMG! Our founding mother and fathers were CORPORATISTS? And... THEOCRATS?
And, didn't you persecute other religions by denying them the right to vote? OMG! Our very founding mothers and fathers were engaged in VOTER SUPPRESSION in the Plymouth and the Massachusetts Bay Colonies?
Of course, I am proud that you only hanged people in the town square and didn't burn anyone at the stake. But, still, your record on CAPITAL PUNISHMENT stinks.
Thank goodness there were a few others who came along. Almost had an anxiety attack until I remembered Thomas Jefferson. Whew.
Our great country still has its share of citizens who want the USA to be a Christian theocracy. We have many citizens support the rights of corporations as people. We actually have political leaders who rig elections and write laws to suppress voting. We have many citizens who strongly support murder by the state: capital punishment. The ideological descendants of Puritans? I will leave that to historians and philosophers but I suspect that is paying them too high a compliment. The Puritans valued education.
Oh, and I just love them all!
Oh, I hope I didn't hurt anyone's feelings!
Your friend,
Vivian
Friday, July 13, 2012
Dear Pols: About Women's Issues
Dear Pols in the World of Women’s Issues:
What to do? What to do?
The world of “Women’s Issues” is a tangled mess—including that very term. Holy Kitty Cats! I just hate being an issue—don’t you? I feel like so much more!
Well, of course I am going to straighten this all out!
“Women’s Issues” seem to all revolve around the facts that roughly 51% of the population has external genitalia, internal genitalia, DNA, and hormone levels defining them as female. Why is this an issue? I blame it all on St. Augustine.
Of course, there are a host of issues we won’t even get into here—such as when external and internal genitalia, DNA, hormonal levels, etc. are not all in alignment! We won’t even address sexual identity, either! Or attraction. But, I digress...
Listen up. You did know that women make up the majority of voters, right? Oh... you didn't know? That explains it!
It is time for voters to have platforms. Why do political candidates have platforms, anyway? Voters need to lean on candidates--and I mean lean hard. Women, let's start leaning.
Here is... MY PLATFORM AS A VOTER:
I want political leaders who support human and women’s rights!
Let’s start with something we all have in common. Being human! I support human rights. I support equal rights for everyone who comes under the category of “human” and that includes “women.” Yes, it is a radical notion. Still. After all these years. Decades. And... decades... and... Long after women’s suffrage.... Still supporting women’s rights.
I want political leaders who support Planned Parenthood and easy affordable access to obstetrical and gynecological health care services for women.
Women need reproductive health care their entire lives--it isn’t just about sex and sex and more sex. And sluts. And more sex... And Rush Limbaugh. It’s about saving lives. Invest in prevention and save lives--and, money.
I want political leaders who support free and easily available contraception.
This must be one of the best investments any society could make.
I support candidates who support sex education--scientifically/medically based sex education.
I do not want government or religion dictating the teaching of religion/morality in public schools.
I support political representatives who will hold all health care professionals responsible to serve all patients according to the patients’ health care wants and needs and not the professional’s personal religious views.
There should be no “conscience clause.” There should be (and are) "professional ethics clauses." It is not religious discrimination to require professionals to uphold their ethical professional responsibilities to meet patients’ health care needs.
How could anyone enter a health care profession (or how could a Church go into the business of health care), but only offer services consistent with their own private religious beliefs? This is holding health care patients hostage to the religious beliefs of health care providers and is profoundly unethical.
I want candidates who support stem cell research.
I support science. I support research. I support saving lives through stem-cell research. There is no adequate substitute for embryonic stem cell research and I do not want to hear phony science from politicians, parties or candidates. I do not want our government taking religious positions on matters of public policy and health.
I support candidates who support a woman’s right to choose. I support candidates who will vote to make abortion easily accessible and affordable and keep it safe and legal.
I do not want the government and religion involved in personal private medical decisions
I support a woman’s right to choose. I trust that women, their doctors, couples, and families can make the best decisions in their own best interests.
I do not want Roe v Wade chipped away inch by inch.
I ask political leaders not make the most personal and private decisions for others--and not to ask others to follow their religious beliefs..
My dear, dear candidates. Do not ask me, in any way whatsoever, to do anything that is demeaning to myself, my gender, my own self-interest, or my own intellectual/emotional/physical well-being.
And, do not ask me or anyone else to practice your religion.
Hmmmm... yep... that about sums it up! That is part of my platform. You surely didn’t think that was all, did you? We haven’t even touched on foreign policy!
Oh, candidates and politicians, I just love you so much! Now, listen to women! We are going to be leaning on you very hard. We are your mothers, after all! I don't mean depending on you, you silly men! Lean left!
Your friend,
Vivian
What to do? What to do?
The world of “Women’s Issues” is a tangled mess—including that very term. Holy Kitty Cats! I just hate being an issue—don’t you? I feel like so much more!
Well, of course I am going to straighten this all out!
“Women’s Issues” seem to all revolve around the facts that roughly 51% of the population has external genitalia, internal genitalia, DNA, and hormone levels defining them as female. Why is this an issue? I blame it all on St. Augustine.
Of course, there are a host of issues we won’t even get into here—such as when external and internal genitalia, DNA, hormonal levels, etc. are not all in alignment! We won’t even address sexual identity, either! Or attraction. But, I digress...
Listen up. You did know that women make up the majority of voters, right? Oh... you didn't know? That explains it!
It is time for voters to have platforms. Why do political candidates have platforms, anyway? Voters need to lean on candidates--and I mean lean hard. Women, let's start leaning.
Here is... MY PLATFORM AS A VOTER:
I want political leaders who support human and women’s rights!
Let’s start with something we all have in common. Being human! I support human rights. I support equal rights for everyone who comes under the category of “human” and that includes “women.” Yes, it is a radical notion. Still. After all these years. Decades. And... decades... and... Long after women’s suffrage.... Still supporting women’s rights.
I want political leaders who support Planned Parenthood and easy affordable access to obstetrical and gynecological health care services for women.
Women need reproductive health care their entire lives--it isn’t just about sex and sex and more sex. And sluts. And more sex... And Rush Limbaugh. It’s about saving lives. Invest in prevention and save lives--and, money.
I want political leaders who support free and easily available contraception.
This must be one of the best investments any society could make.
I support candidates who support sex education--scientifically/medically based sex education.
I do not want government or religion dictating the teaching of religion/morality in public schools.
I support political representatives who will hold all health care professionals responsible to serve all patients according to the patients’ health care wants and needs and not the professional’s personal religious views.
There should be no “conscience clause.” There should be (and are) "professional ethics clauses." It is not religious discrimination to require professionals to uphold their ethical professional responsibilities to meet patients’ health care needs.
How could anyone enter a health care profession (or how could a Church go into the business of health care), but only offer services consistent with their own private religious beliefs? This is holding health care patients hostage to the religious beliefs of health care providers and is profoundly unethical.
I want candidates who support stem cell research.
I support science. I support research. I support saving lives through stem-cell research. There is no adequate substitute for embryonic stem cell research and I do not want to hear phony science from politicians, parties or candidates. I do not want our government taking religious positions on matters of public policy and health.
I support candidates who support a woman’s right to choose. I support candidates who will vote to make abortion easily accessible and affordable and keep it safe and legal.
I do not want the government and religion involved in personal private medical decisions
I support a woman’s right to choose. I trust that women, their doctors, couples, and families can make the best decisions in their own best interests.
I do not want Roe v Wade chipped away inch by inch.
I ask political leaders not make the most personal and private decisions for others--and not to ask others to follow their religious beliefs..
My dear, dear candidates. Do not ask me, in any way whatsoever, to do anything that is demeaning to myself, my gender, my own self-interest, or my own intellectual/emotional/physical well-being.
And, do not ask me or anyone else to practice your religion.
Hmmmm... yep... that about sums it up! That is part of my platform. You surely didn’t think that was all, did you? We haven’t even touched on foreign policy!
Oh, candidates and politicians, I just love you so much! Now, listen to women! We are going to be leaning on you very hard. We are your mothers, after all! I don't mean depending on you, you silly men! Lean left!
Your friend,
Vivian
Sunday, June 17, 2012
Dear Cave Men
Dear Rep Mike Callton and Majority Floor Leader Jim Stamas:
FEMALE GENITALIA, VULVA, CLITORIS, VESTIBULE, GLANDS, UTERUS, FUNDUS, CERVIX, GONADS (oh, yes women do), OVARIES, FOLLICLE, ENDOCRINE CELLS, FALLOPIAN TUBES, BARTHOLIN GLANDS and VAGINA.
Are all of these "dirty words" that cannot be said on the "House Floor?" Please be more specific, because my doctor is using these words and I might have to report him to the medical ethics board.
What is wrong with you? Are you ignorant? Crazy? Mean? Unintelligent? Or, trying to score points with the ignorant, crazy, mean, and unintelligent?
VAGINA is a medical term. VAGINA is in the dictionary. VAGINAE are a part of female anatomy--a part of women's bodies just as are the nose, eyes, toes, and knees. Just as the penis or the ear is a part of a man's body.
"What she said was offensive," Rep. Mike Callton (R-Nashville) said. "It was so offensive, I don't even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company."
"My concern was the decorum of the House, not of anything she said," said Majority Floor Leader Jim Stamas (R-Midland). "I ask all members to maintain a decorum of the House, and I felt it went too far yesterday."
Those were your replies to Michigan State Representative Lisa Brown using the word "vagina" on the house floor while speaking out against an anti-abortion bill. My dear gentlemen, if the word VAGINA isn't appropriate then, when is it?
Am I to understand that the words "rape," "incest," and "anti-abortion" do not offend you but the word VAGINA does? This is wrong. Where is the decorum in anti-abortion, rape and incest?
It is wrong that men are making laws governing women's bodies.
It is wrong that ignorant men are making laws governing women's bodies. I will hazard a guess that not 10% of anti-health care for women, anti-choice, anti-Planned Parenthood, anti-contraception, anti-Plan B, etc. etc. etc. lawmakers know what a blastocyst is or could define 10% of these terms: http://quizlet.com/907671/medical-terminology-chapter-14-the-reproductive-systems-flash-cards/
It is wrong that some citizens of the United States are being required to follow the religious beliefs of other citizens. Lawmakers should practice their religion and not legislate it. Abortion and all issues related to female reproductive care are no exception.
It is wrong that men who do not know the difference between dirty words and medical terminology are making laws governing women's bodies.
It is wrong that men whose only association to female anatomy seems to be sexual are allowed to pass legislation regulating female health care.
It is frightening that a male lawmaker finds a descriptive medical term for a woman's female genitalia offensive and as a psychiatric social worker (retired) I believe that this renders him incompetent to vote on these issue.
The inability to use descriptive neutral language by anyone would indicate significant repression and denial that might interfere with theie ability to deal with important social issues. Ex: "The poor don't really suffer." "Rape and incest are so infrequent they don't really matter." "The reproductive organs of women are not something to be discussed in polite society and... therefore are not deserving of health care."
If lawmakers are so repressed that they are unable to use medical terminology, how can penile cancer, ovarian cancer, VAGINAL CANER, etc. and insurance coverage, Medicare, MA, rape, incest and other issues be discussed and problems solved for the sake of our communities and country?
Gentlemen, did you know that the VAGINA isn't just an empty space for a penis or a baby. It is a body organ, a muscular tube extending from the cervix to the opening of the body. Did you know that women get VAGINAL CANCER? Did you know that some times women have to have their VAGINAE removed?
How have we, as a country of sane, intelligent, compassionate, and educated people come to the point where our lawmakers behave with such displays of ignorance?
How can you stand before the entire world and behave worse than cavemen? You are a disgrace to man-hood. I hope your wives and children are ashamed to go out with you today, on Father's Day.
Oh, of course, I love you. If I didn't, who would? Agape, and all that.
Your friend,
Vivian
FEMALE GENITALIA, VULVA, CLITORIS, VESTIBULE, GLANDS, UTERUS, FUNDUS, CERVIX, GONADS (oh, yes women do), OVARIES, FOLLICLE, ENDOCRINE CELLS, FALLOPIAN TUBES, BARTHOLIN GLANDS and VAGINA.
Are all of these "dirty words" that cannot be said on the "House Floor?" Please be more specific, because my doctor is using these words and I might have to report him to the medical ethics board.
What is wrong with you? Are you ignorant? Crazy? Mean? Unintelligent? Or, trying to score points with the ignorant, crazy, mean, and unintelligent?
VAGINA is a medical term. VAGINA is in the dictionary. VAGINAE are a part of female anatomy--a part of women's bodies just as are the nose, eyes, toes, and knees. Just as the penis or the ear is a part of a man's body.
"What she said was offensive," Rep. Mike Callton (R-Nashville) said. "It was so offensive, I don't even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company."
"My concern was the decorum of the House, not of anything she said," said Majority Floor Leader Jim Stamas (R-Midland). "I ask all members to maintain a decorum of the House, and I felt it went too far yesterday."
Those were your replies to Michigan State Representative Lisa Brown using the word "vagina" on the house floor while speaking out against an anti-abortion bill. My dear gentlemen, if the word VAGINA isn't appropriate then, when is it?
Am I to understand that the words "rape," "incest," and "anti-abortion" do not offend you but the word VAGINA does? This is wrong. Where is the decorum in anti-abortion, rape and incest?
It is wrong that men are making laws governing women's bodies.
It is wrong that ignorant men are making laws governing women's bodies. I will hazard a guess that not 10% of anti-health care for women, anti-choice, anti-Planned Parenthood, anti-contraception, anti-Plan B, etc. etc. etc. lawmakers know what a blastocyst is or could define 10% of these terms: http://quizlet.com/907671/medical-terminology-chapter-14-the-reproductive-systems-flash-cards/
It is wrong that some citizens of the United States are being required to follow the religious beliefs of other citizens. Lawmakers should practice their religion and not legislate it. Abortion and all issues related to female reproductive care are no exception.
It is wrong that men who do not know the difference between dirty words and medical terminology are making laws governing women's bodies.
It is wrong that men whose only association to female anatomy seems to be sexual are allowed to pass legislation regulating female health care.
It is frightening that a male lawmaker finds a descriptive medical term for a woman's female genitalia offensive and as a psychiatric social worker (retired) I believe that this renders him incompetent to vote on these issue.
The inability to use descriptive neutral language by anyone would indicate significant repression and denial that might interfere with theie ability to deal with important social issues. Ex: "The poor don't really suffer." "Rape and incest are so infrequent they don't really matter." "The reproductive organs of women are not something to be discussed in polite society and... therefore are not deserving of health care."
If lawmakers are so repressed that they are unable to use medical terminology, how can penile cancer, ovarian cancer, VAGINAL CANER, etc. and insurance coverage, Medicare, MA, rape, incest and other issues be discussed and problems solved for the sake of our communities and country?
Gentlemen, did you know that the VAGINA isn't just an empty space for a penis or a baby. It is a body organ, a muscular tube extending from the cervix to the opening of the body. Did you know that women get VAGINAL CANCER? Did you know that some times women have to have their VAGINAE removed?
How have we, as a country of sane, intelligent, compassionate, and educated people come to the point where our lawmakers behave with such displays of ignorance?
How can you stand before the entire world and behave worse than cavemen? You are a disgrace to man-hood. I hope your wives and children are ashamed to go out with you today, on Father's Day.
Oh, of course, I love you. If I didn't, who would? Agape, and all that.
Your friend,
Vivian
"Michigan Lawmaker Banned from Speaking on House Floor After Saying the Word ‘Vagina’ During Abortion Bill Debate" [http://gawker.com/5918682/michigan-lawmaker-banned-from-speaking-on-house-floor-after-saying-the-word-vagina-during-abortion-bill-debate?utm_campaign=socialflow_gawker_facebook&utm_source=gawker_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow]
Saturday, June 16, 2012
Dear Murderers by Neglect
Dear Murderers by Neglect:
Do you ever have thoughts that
hover around your consciousness? You may even say the words but don’t allow
yourself to really truly deeply think the thought.
Then, one day, you do—think the
thought. And, you cannot breathe for a second. Your chest hurts.
You would rather rant and rave
than quietly speak some terrible truth.
My terrible truth is that I
believe that letting people die by neglect is the same as murdering them.
Neglecting to provide medical
care, food, clothing, and shelter for those in need, who cannot provide it for
themselves, leads to death.
Do our lawmakers, who do not
want anyone to receive an ounce of charity, a single thing that they do not pay
for, a single penny of their tax money, kill those who die from lack of medical care,
malnutrition, and shelter?
My heart is beating out of my
chest—I believe that there is no difference in killing people by neglect and
shooting them in the head.
Do I believe that voters who
live in terror that some poor soul will receive a root canal, a cancer
screening, a day in the hospital at the taxpayers expense are guilty of the
deaths of people who die in our own town, county, state, and nation from
neglect? I do.
Here is a common scenario. Someone
doesn't have insurance and gets ill. Then...they cannot get insurance. They
apply for MA and or disability AND unless
they meet very specific criteria, they don't get it. They don't get it even
though they cannot work, their doctor tells them not to work, they are
physically unable to work… Meanwhile, their illness is progressing. They have
to apply 3 times--and, how odd, they have to hire an attorney. THEN, they get
disability and MA. At which time, they are past the point of recovery.
To deprive people of “health care” or insurance, or food and
shelter is to deprive them of life. Of
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness one might say.
Not everyone will go this far, but, yes, I would provide health
care and assistance to everyone including illegal aliens, their children, and
heroin addicts passed out in the ditch by the road side.
And, yes, of course I also believe that every single one of
us ought to strive in every way to be 200% responsible for ourselves, our
family members, our dependent children, our parents, our adult children, our
retirement, and even help friends and neighbors.
But, in an age when one overnight stay in a hospital plus
tests can cost $30,000, a visit to your doctor can cost $200.00, and you cannot
get insurance once you have diabetes, no
one can afford health care. Individuals are not in charge of the economy and cannot create jobs. In some areas, property values are down by 50%--individuals did not cause that and cannot cure it. People can no longer survive by squirrel hunting and raising a garden.
So, if you vote to deny your neighbors, your friends, and your
family members health care, then I think you are causing their deaths directly.
I judge myself by these same standards and find myself
guilty—not of how I vote, but of failing to provide sufficient help.
So, I love you and want you to receive health care, food,
shelter because I want you to live a long and healthy life. I have seen many
people (including children) without health care or the very basics of life and…
I cannot even think of appropriate words.
I hope I have hurt your feelings today.
Much love from your friend,
Vivian
PS Yes, I know I am a dark, dark person with dark thoughts. You should know my faults!
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Dear Cardinal Sinners
Dear Sinners:
My life has been a little boring for the past
week, so I thought I’d do a little research on sin.
Imagine my surprise! I thought that the 7 Deadly
Sins all ended in “sexuality” as in homo…sexuality, hetero…sexuality, elder…sexuality...
Imagine my surprise! Consenting adults—you can
breathe deeply. I meant easily. You can breathe easily.
However,
my dear Republicans who have been writing and speaking maliciously and
enviously of teachers, union workers and all other
accomplished, glamorous, and wealthy people—this letter is for you!
We are all sinners, of course. The difference
being that some of us know it and some don’t.
Hope I didn’t hurt your feelings! Oh, you didn’t
get it~
Well, I am talking about the Seven Cardinal Sins,
of course! Envy in particular!
The Party of Family Values sure is making sinners
out of their followers. This is one of the best tactics in the major “Divide
and Conquor” strategy and it is working like a Fleet Enema—bringing out the stinkiest
in humankind.
I’ve written about this before but I just cannot
look away even though it makes my eyes sting, my lungs burn, and, frankly my
heart ache for the sinner.
OK, so, let’s talk sin. “Sin” with a capital “S.”
Mortal Sin. Sin that destroys from the inside. Sin that destroys the humanity
of a person, the charity, the life of grace and compassion. Charity—as in “Though
I speak with the tongues of men and of angels and have not charity…” Sin that
brings the threat of you know where and what. Sin that destroys the loving
heart.
Ah… You thought we were just talking politics,
didn’t you? No, it is never, “just politics.” Never. Politics is nothing more
than the public expression of your private soul—I can seeeeeee you! And, vice
versa.
Envy isn’t just greed. It is more malicious than
greed. Envy is deeper than greed. It is uglier than greed.
That is why it makes my eyes burn to look at
envy. That is why you have a catch in your throat when you read something
written with raw unadulterated envy.
It hurts to see so many people that want to lower the standard of living of
those they envy rather than improve their own lives and those of every human being. Wow. That makes my chest
hurt.
The Mortal Sin of envy is a desire to deprive
others of what they have. Not the desire to go out and get it for themselves.
The desire to take something away from others.
So, my dear Sinners, for
the love of Pete I am sick of seeing your exposed psyches in public! Put on
some psychological clothing, for crying out loud! I know all I ever wanted to,
and more, about your sorry excuse for a soul!
Do little old ladies still say to children, “Now,
don’t be ugly,” when they say and do repulsive things? I think not, by the way
some people are comporting themselves!
The Republican strategy of “Divide and Conquer”
isn’t going to change because we let it work.
Enviers, I still love you. I really, really do! I
am simply gobsmacked as to why you would envy a Kindergarten teacher’s salary
instead of … say… the net worth of a Koch brother or two? Oh, the teachers only
work 9 months a year and the Koch brothers inherited the foundation of their
wealth! Now, I get it!
Well, slackers, if I were not in fear for my
immortal soul and what the neighbors would think, I would be envious of
stinking rich beautiful people under 30 years of age. But, what do I know?
Maybe you know something about teachers I don’t.
Your friend,
Vivian
PS Sorry to have no faith in your reading comprehension, but you write ignorant, nasty, envy filled diatribes all over the internet and sign your real names. This reveals to the world the contents of your soul. Please stop because it ruins my dinner.
PPS Great idea--Have protests at churches protesting greed, pride, envy, and gluttony on the part of the wealthy!
PPPS I am guilty of wrath. And, sloth. And,glutton. And, some other thingys.
Monday, June 4, 2012
VOTER VOTING INFORMATION JANESVILLE Voter voting information Janesville.
Dear Mucnicipalities:
Dear Clerks:
Voter voting information Janesville. Let's talk. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528
Let's talk. About voter & voting information in Janesville. And Rock County. And all of Wisconsin. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Have you all updated your pages? When did you update your pages? Do they just beg people to get out and vote? NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Voter voting information Janesville. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 And Rock County. All of Wisconsin. I just love this place, don't you? I love information. I love voting. I love voting. NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
I am so hoping that you have all updated your pages on the new voting laws--especially the fact that WISCONSIN DOES NOT REQUIRE A PHOTO ID TO VOTE ON JUNE 5. I do hope that you did that really really fast and that no ugly words...like "voter suppression" get thrown around. My goodness! That sends chills up my spine. NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Voter voting information Janesville. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5.NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
"Google:" Voter voting information Janesville. Rock County. Wisconsin. That should take you to some very accurate voting information pages: http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 IMHO, I think that page should scream, YEAH! YOU DON'T NEED A WORTHLESS OL' PHOTO ID TO VOTE!!!!
NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Voter voting information Janesville. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528
Dear Clerks:
Voter voting information Janesville. Let's talk. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528
Let's talk. About voter & voting information in Janesville. And Rock County. And all of Wisconsin. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Have you all updated your pages? When did you update your pages? Do they just beg people to get out and vote? NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Voter voting information Janesville. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 And Rock County. All of Wisconsin. I just love this place, don't you? I love information. I love voting. I love voting. NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
I am so hoping that you have all updated your pages on the new voting laws--especially the fact that WISCONSIN DOES NOT REQUIRE A PHOTO ID TO VOTE ON JUNE 5. I do hope that you did that really really fast and that no ugly words...like "voter suppression" get thrown around. My goodness! That sends chills up my spine. NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Voter voting information Janesville. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5.NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
"Google:" Voter voting information Janesville. Rock County. Wisconsin. That should take you to some very accurate voting information pages: http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528 IMHO, I think that page should scream, YEAH! YOU DON'T NEED A WORTHLESS OL' PHOTO ID TO VOTE!!!!
NO PHOTO REQUIRED TO VOTE IN WI ON JUNE 5. YOU MAY REGISTER AT THE POLLS. PROOF OF RESIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO REGISTER. A PHOTO ID IS NOT.
Voter voting information Janesville. http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.aspx?page=528
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)